[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: choice in core infrastructure decisions (Re: Bug#684396: ITP: openrc -- alternative boot mechanism)

On Aug 11, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:

> Exactly! And in this particular case, the "vendor" is RedHat, and
> the programs are systemd and udev. If we can have an alternative,
> using OpenRC and mdev, then I really welcome it! Choosing systemd
> just because it *seem* to look better *now*, knowing that we have
> a quite hostile upstream, *and* dismissing any other alternative,
We are not dismissing any other alternative, upstart still looks like 
an option.
We are dismissing just openrc because its incremental benefits are 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: