On 06/07/12 06:32, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 1. General consensus in the project that supporting the option of Secure > Boot, including purchase of a Microsoft-signed certificate, is > worthwhile and not entirely objectionable. (I am assuming that it would > be a waste of time to use our own platform key, as anyone who can work > out how to install that can also disable Secure Boot.) > This are the FSF recommendations: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/whitepaper-web Regards! -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineering http://www.igalia.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature