Re: Best Practices on testing-proposed-updates vs unstable vs experimental after testing freeze
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Bernd Zeimetz <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 09:49 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 25/06/12 06:07, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> 1. upload 2.0 to experimental, and unstable users should install it manually.
>> This is usually the right answer: if version 1.0 is intended to go in
>> the next Debian release, it should get as much testing as possible,
>> which means it should be the default for unstable users.
I am talking about after freeze.
> Also it avoids that you have to go trough testing-proposed-updates for
> fixes in wheezy - you upload to unstable, test there and if it works as
> expected you ask the release team for a freeze exception to fix the
> issues in wheezy.
Some guys may prefer unstable as an roll distribution.
> Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
> GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
> Archive: [🔎] 4FE83470.email@example.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4FE83470.firstname.lastname@example.org