Re: Packaging on GitHub ?
On 05/30/2012 05:33 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>>>>>> Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> writes:
>>>>>> Charles Plessy dixit:
>
> >> upstream source moved to GitHub, and we would like to try to
> >> maintain the Debian package there as well.
>
> > This is not a good idea: http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
>
> That's why I tend to advocate for the use of Gitorious instead.
Imho the site is more confusing than anything else - unfortunately.
> --cut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitorious --
> CAPTION: Gitorious
>
> Developer(s) Shortcut AS
> Written in Ruby
> Operating system Cross-platform
> Available in English
> Type Project management software
> License GNU Affero General Public License
> Website https://gitorious.org/gitorious/
> --cut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitorious --
>
> PS. An RFP, perhaps?
Better look into packaging gitlabhq.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: