Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:41:40PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Wasn't the main reason (apart from the seniority argument) for
> > preserving the node name for ax25 to prevent remote unmonitored highly
> > important systems from failing?
>
> If such systems are highly important, should we accomodate them
> remaining unmonitored?
>
> Surely if they are unmonitored, then they are not considered
> sufficiently important to monitor. So “highly important” ceases to carry
> any weight in such cases. No?
>
The systems are not "unmonitored" they are physically difficult to access.
One of the tools used to monitor them is connecting to them with the node
application.
Pat
Reply to: