Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
Andrei POPESCU <email@example.com> writes:
> On Ma, 27 mar 12, 08:36:58, David Banks wrote:
>> In the specific case of mosh, I have posted three RFS messages to
>> debian-mentors since filing the ITP, in addition to the creation of the
>> RFS bug after the sponsorship-requests procedure was announced, so the
>> package was certainly being worked on. However I did not CC the RFS
>> messages to the ITP bug, so they weren't recorded there. Would this be
>> a recommended practice? How should it interact with the new
>> sponsorship-requests process?
> Block the ITP bug by the RFS bug?
> Kind regards,
+1. Since RFS are also bugs that seems to be the natural way to connect