[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over

On Ma, 27 mar 12, 08:36:58, David Banks wrote:
> In the specific case of mosh, I have posted three RFS messages to
> debian-mentors since filing the ITP, in addition to the creation of the
> RFS bug after the sponsorship-requests procedure was announced, so the
> package was certainly being worked on.  However I did not CC the RFS
> messages to the ITP bug, so they weren't recorded there.  Would this be
> a recommended practice?  How should it interact with the new
> sponsorship-requests process?

Block the ITP bug by the RFS bug?

Kind regards,
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: