[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#661591: packages providing ifupdown scripts must have those scripts fixed if needed


On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:47:57 +0100
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) wrote:

> > Yes, that's probably a reasonable threshold.  What should packages
> > like miredo and wide-dhcpv6-client do?  Both of these hooks have to
> > do with

> Maybe they could stop pretending that the ifupdown configuration
> model can properly support multiple address families.

How's that? Explain, please.

> > which means it's incumbent on you as the ifupdown maintainer to
> > coordinate this behavior change with the maintainers of those other
> > packages.  *Not*

> This is going to be a problem, considering that for most practical 
> purposes ifupdown lacks a maintainer.

Somehow 'Maintainer' field of the control file doesn't agree with you.

WBR, Andrew

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: