On Feb 28, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > The Linux kernel project has some serious and ongoing structural > problems and I think it's very important that as a project we keep our > options open. Even if I were willing to accept this argument as valid[1], it's worth remembering that switching to a new (and probably not yet existing) kernel would be a much bigger effort than moving away from sysvinit. > I have no hesitation in utterly rejecting the idea that we should base > our system on a project whose upstream refuse to consider portability > as a worthwhile goal. I have no hesitation in utterly rejecting the idea that we should base major decisions which will seriously affect the viability of Debian in the real world on FUD. [1] Just about everything has serious and ongoing structural problems. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature