Le dimanche 26 février 2012 à 13:05 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > “Demo version not suitable for production” sounds much like our kFreeBSD > ports. (The Hurd port does not even go as far.) To clarify, since I was asked on IRC: I’m not implying that we should not *aim* for the goal of making kFreeBSD suitable for production. I’ve even been among maintainers working on porting their packages. However we are still far from it, so I don’t think it is fair to call an init replacement “not suitable for production” because it doesn’t work for a system which itself is not (and another system which is no more than a running gag). Or, as has been said countless times otherwise: kFreeBSD should not hinder the improvement of the Linux ports. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part