Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 11:36 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 09:37 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:51 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 15:42 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Are you really committed to Debian? Maybe you should work for Canonical
> > > or RedHat?
> > Please take such mail elsewhere, preferably to /dev/null. (You may also
> > wish to get a little more of a clue as to some of the organisations
> > which employ active DDs.)
> Looks like Steve is an employee of Canonical. Yes, I could have found
> that out, but are you really expected to check every person submitting
> to this mailing list before sending a mail to it.
You're expected to send mails to a technical list in a manner such that
it shouldn't matter who any of the participants may or may not be
employed by or what other interests they may have. That was the primary
point of both my and Russ's messages and one which you appear to be
continuing to miss.
If it's still not clear, then I give up. I have more constructive
things to spend my time on, and I'm sure most other readers of the list
> > > Yes, I'm prepared to take the flames!
> > Debian's technical lists aren't, nor do they belong there.
> I was maybe overreacting,
There's no "maybe" about it.
> but the main issue remains: Debian is working
> according to their social contract, and the principles should not be
> overridden by commercial interests. Debian main interest is and should
> in the future also be focused on their users, nothing else!!
-1, trolling. (If it wasn't intentional, you may wish to research the
history of posters attempting to justify things by invoking SC4.)