Ian Jackson <email@example.com> (14/11/2011): > I didn't fancy fighting glibc upstream. However we have a new > upstream since we are now using eglibc so I should perhaps actually > try that. From <http://www.eglibc.org/contributing>: | Applicability | | EGLIBC is focused on support for embedded systems. Therefore, if your | change is of general utility, or is likely to be of more benefit to | workstation and server developers than to embedded developers, then you | should contribute it to GLIBC, rather than EGLIBC. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature