Re: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)
From: Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:26:17 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20111108232617.GB2249@p12n.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111108224127.GG12380@teal.hq.k1024.org>
References: <20111009134835.GA31652@upsilon.cc> <[🔎] 20111108224127.GG12380@teal.hq.k1024.org>

[Iustin Pop]
> Could/should Debian make it easier for each package to have an own email
> list (i.e. making it easier to have "1-person team maintenance")?

We have {pkg}@packages.debian.org and {srcpkg}@packages.qa.debian.org.
I don't know if mail to these aliases get archived, but at least it is
going through Debian infrastructure.  The latter even, I believe, uses
proper list software.
-- 
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)
  - From: Iustin Pop <iustin@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying bootstrap on circular-dependent packages
Next by Date: Re: Resolve namce conflise with node and nodejs [was Re: Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?]
Previous by thread: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)
Next by thread: Re: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread