On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:41:20 -0400 Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> wrote: > thanks once again > > > Your understanding is misguided. If you intend it to be a user > > interface, it belongs on the PATH. If you don't, it belongs > > under /usr/lib. > > I hear you regarding that ideally they should be on the PATH... > but -- nothing in FHS talks about PATH. > > thoughts aloud: > > science could indeed be considered a game -- may be I should > advise on such PATH-driven interpretation and ask upstream to place > their binaries under /usr/games then which is in the PATH -- then > we should all be compliant with our intertrepations of FHS ;) > damn... there is only 1 /usr/games so once again -- conflicts > conflicts conflicts Not sure what you're trying to suggest here? The FHS *is* clear on what goes in /usr/games: games Games and educational binaries (optional) > not sure if of any point, since the list seems to be only full of > SPAM I have posted my question to [1]. > > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20111102222553.GL10325%40onerussian.com&forum_name=freestandards-fhs-discuss This is not the proper location for FHS discussion, [1] is. [1] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature