Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license
Stefano Zacchiroli <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:25:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Actually, based on the surveys I've done of licensing information, I
>> think it's unlikely that the AGPL will ever become that popular of a
>> license. I doubt it will even pass the GFDL, which we probably should
>> not have accepted into common-licenses.
> Thanks for this prompt feedback.
> ... and gosh, I didn't imagine AGPL share was so low in the Debian
> archive. (Countering bad gut feelings is what data are useful for!)
Yes, indeed. :) I supported adding the GFDL 1.3 to common-licenses on
the basis of a similar gut feeling, and it's still sitting there at only
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>