[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:25:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Actually, based on the surveys I've done of licensing information, I think
> it's unlikely that the AGPL will ever become that popular of a license.  I
> doubt it will even pass the GFDL, which we probably should not have
> accepted into common-licenses.

Thanks for this prompt feedback.

... and gosh, I didn't imagine AGPL share was so low in the Debian
archive. (Countering bad gut feelings is what data are useful for!)

Stefano Zacchiroli     zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ......   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ......   . . o
Debian Project Leader    .......   @zack on identi.ca   .......    o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: