On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for > those cases you mentioned. Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be followed immediately by a binNMU. [Are there any cases where we wouldn't want to rebuild the package after it was bootstrapped?] Don Armstrong -- Identical parts aren't. -- Beach's Law http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu