Re: packaging-dev meta package
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> wrote:
> Do you like the idea or not?
Seems reasonable.
> Do you have a better name for the meta package?
How about build-something (keeping with the build-essential naming)?
build-depends-common
build-recommends
build-suggests
> Should something added to or removed from the dependency list?
devscripts
the various vcs-buildpackage scripts
sbuild
schroot
signing-party (for caff)
lintian
valgrind
gdb
cppcheck
pyflakes
perlcritic
<more static analysis tools>
Please make most of the dependencies recommends so that people can
easily pick and choose what they want installed.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Reply to: