Re: packaging-dev meta package
The Fungi <fungi@yuggoth.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> [...]
> > Should something added to or removed from the dependency list?
>
> Not so much a vote for or against the main idea of the meta package
> itself, but a glaring omission in my mind is piuparts, which is
> great for package QA.
Which goes hand-in-hand with ‘pbuilder’ to ensure one's package behaves
properly in a minimal Debian environment.
--
\ “I knew it was a shocking thing to say, but … no-one has the |
`\ right to spend their life without being offended.” —Philip |
_o__) Pullman, 2010-03-28 |
Ben Finney
Reply to: