On 11-05-26 at 02:20pm, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > Recommends or Suggests: > > > cdbs > > > cmake > > > My reasoning on these two was that some people probably aren't > > interested in switching from cdbs to quilt, so coming across > > packages still using it will be common for a while. CMake is a > > corollary to autoconf and heavily used in KDE-land, which seems like > > a not-insignificant number of packages. > > But in both cases, those should be pulled in as build-depends, no? > > To have them as dependencies of this package sounds to me like you're > recommending these tools for use. now this is getting interesting: This really is a debate on whether Debian should encourage or discourage development using CDBS and Qt? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature