On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:46 +0100, Wookey wrote: [...] > I do think that getting the 'win32' arch name and triplet defined in > dpkg-architecture is stage 1 for you. I thought we'd already done that > years ago, when this last came up, but obviously not. > dpkg-architecture already supports 269 options including such > not-very-useful combinations as uclibc-linux-s390 and solaris-alpha, > so it really ought to know about the win32 and win64 ABIs. It's > generally a very simple patch to a few tables in dpkg to add a new arch. [...] By the way, it should be something like 'win32-i386' rather than just 'win32'. The non-x86 ports of NT 3.x and 4.0 are not really relevant but an ARM port of Windows is supposed to be coming soon. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part