On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45:06AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:40:52PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > > From discussion on IRC earlier this evening, it looks like the most > > pragmatic approach will be to get the apt and aptitude sbuild > > resolvers to strip the alternatives (after arch reduction), which > > will make them behave pretty much exactly like the old internal > > resolver, but without its bugs. This will leave maintainers free to > > use alternative dependencies, but like now they will be ignored. > > What we can do though, is make the use of alternatives configurable > > in sbuild, so you will be able to make use of them when building for > > other suites e.g. backports. This will disable the stripping. > > I find this acceptable. Thanks for driving this. > > Kind regards > Philipp Kern > >  I didn't agree with the earlier suggestion of telling people to stop > the use of alternatives instead of using predictable behaviour on > the resolver side but tried to stay out of the thread. Hi, and apologies in advance if this is a stupid question or if it has already been discussed :) Is it possible that this should lead to problems with further levels of package dependencies? E.g. something like that for two packages: foo/control: Depends: bar-dev, libdb-dev | libdb4.7-dev bar-dev/control: Depends: libdb4.7-dev I realize that this is a somewhat contrived case, but still... wouldn't it break, or would that be considered a bug in the packages' dependencies? If the latter, well, wouldn't this leave the maintainer of foo a bit vulnerable against random decisions by the maintainers of bar-dev? G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev email@example.com roam@FreeBSD.org firstname.lastname@example.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word.
Description: Digital signature