Patrick Matthäi <firstname.lastname@example.org> (13/02/2011): > since we have got a stable release with dkms now, I am asking > myself, if it is still necessary to support module-assistant. > > dkms is IMHO the better system and maintaining two different systems > for kernel modules is a bit bloated. > > I think there should be a decission for wheezy, how we should > continue with it. *MAYBE* you could put the maintainers in copy? (Eduard added.) That said, I'm no longer interested in maintaining m-a (lack of time is one thing, lack of interest is another, “upstream first” yet another). KiBi.
Description: Digital signature