[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The future of m-a and dkms

Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org> (13/02/2011):
> since we have got a stable release with dkms now, I am asking
> myself, if it is still necessary to support module-assistant.
> dkms is IMHO the better system and maintaining two different systems
> for kernel modules is a bit bloated.
> I think there should be a decission for wheezy, how we should
> continue with it.

*MAYBE* you could put the maintainers in copy? (Eduard added.)

That said, I'm no longer interested in maintaining m-a (lack of time
is one thing, lack of interest is another, “upstream first” yet


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: