On Wednesday 09 February 2011 01.12:57 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Of course, we can simply orphan Qt 3, and hope somebody will step up to > maintain it; we are unconvinced this is a responsible step for us to take > as it would place the maintenance burden of a large package onto the QA > team. If qt3 is really popular with scientific apps, which presumably are slow moving targets which are not esaily /quickly ported to qt4, it should be enough motivation for the people who need qt3 to take on the maintenance, so no need to burden the QA team. You need a piece of software, you do the necessary packaging work - it's that simple, at least in theory. cheers -- vbi -- Today is Setting Orange, the 40th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3177
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.