Re: Can insserv made better?
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Mike Bird <mgb-debian@yosemite.net> wrote:
> On Sat January 15 2011 16:33:28 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> If insserv meses up so bad, shouldn't it be able to detect that things
>> will go wrong too?
>
> insserv completely discards the Snn/Knn values and generates a new
> boot ordering based on much less information and which consequently
> fails more often.
AFAIK insserv doesn't guess. "Much less info" is the dependencies
listed in the scripts themselves, right? Isn't this enough?
Is the problem insserv itself or wrong dependency lists?
Olaf
Reply to: