Re: Bugs in Backported Packages
Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> writes:
> Doing a quick look at the backports mailing list archive, there are less
> than 10 bugs reported per month on average. That is for hundreds of
> packages. Doing some fuzzy math, if you have a package that got
> backported, you may see an additional 10/100 = 0.1 bug reports per
> month (or roughly one bug per year). I don't see how that could be
> remotely considered overburdensome.
I am not using backports precisely because they lack a bug tracker. If
backports gets a bug tracker then I'm probably going to use them and
you can expect more bug reports :-)
Reply to: