Quoting Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org): > > Hmhm, out of curiosity, why is t-p-u “way riskier”. > > Mostly because there isn't any large pool of systems using t-p-u the way > there is for unstable, so the aging process where we get testing in > unstable before migrating the package never happens. This means uploads I wonder whether we (in D-I) could add t-p-u to the list of proposed repositories when users install testing. We already propose security and volatile (defaulting to both added): the same mechanism could be made for t-p-u when users install testing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature