Re: For those who care about their packages in Debian
On 25/08/2010 10:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez <email@example.com> writes:
>> Hmhm, out of curiosity, why is t-p-u “way riskier”.
> Mostly because there isn't any large pool of systems using t-p-u the way
> there is for unstable,
Yeah, good point.
>> Would it be possible (at one point) to “fix” it and stop using unstable
>> as t-p-u and experimental as unstable when freeze is in action?
> We could try to get lots of people who normally use unstable to instead
> test testing plus t-p-u, but I'm not sure they'd be willing to do so. I
> for example don't want to switch my unstable systems to testing plus t-p-u
> for a variety of reasons.
I have a box running testing (well, not updated due to flaky net
connection right now) which I really should pass on testing+t-p-u.
But wouldn't CUT fit nicely there?