Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:06:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4C655F5F.2070108@bzed.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87k4nu4z0j.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 20100811090138.14674.qmail@oak.oeko.net> <[🔎] 87y6cdw8z3.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 87k4nu4z0j.fsf@frosties.localdomain>

On 08/13/2010 11:56 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> 
> The PTS is insufficient for this purpose as it can't automatically
> unsubscribe people when their package is superceeded.

That should not be too hard to implement without an extra control field.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
                   ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>

References:
- Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
  - From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
- Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: More advanced home directory creation in Debian?
Next by Date: Bug#592877: ITP: ups -- Universal Package System
Previous by thread: Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
Next by thread: Re: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread