Re: chromium-browser from experimental has included h.264 by default?

To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: chromium-browser from experimental has included h.264 by default?
From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:16:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4C625C54.2090503@iuculano.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1281468359.5975.292.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
References: <AANLkTiky1lu7WZJ3Ntmh3Ek3tLjqSRl7WTWZaOo7cgSb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE86E30.1000607@iuculano.it> <87zl0781u1.fsf@faui44a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <slrnhuja0l.2d1.jmm@inutil.org> <[🔎] 1281468359.5975.292.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>

On 08/10/2010 09:25 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Chromium isn't meant to be released with Squeeze. We'll reevaluate for
>> > Squeeze+1.
> Is that still the case?

No, it isn't. Please see #581265 and in particular message #32, #37 and #44

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: chromium-browser from experimental has included h.264 by default?
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: doc-base is hugely unloved; bug mass-filing needed?
Next by Date: Raw Idea: one more control field for sponsors
Previous by thread: Re: chromium-browser from experimental has included h.264 by default?
Next by thread: Usage of /var/lib for databases not properly described in policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread