Re: doc-base is hugely unloved; bug mass-filing needed?
Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> writes:
> If there is already a lintian check for this (as Vincent Bernat writes a
> bit down the thread), does that mean the warning gets ignored or
> overridden in all these cases?
windlord:~> lintian-info -t possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
N: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
N:
N: The package ships a .html or .pdf file under /usr/share/doc/, which
N: are usually documentation, but it does not register anything in
N: doc-base. (Files under an examples directory are excluded.)
N:
N: Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.10 (Registering Documents
N: using doc-base) for details.
N:
N: Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible
possible/wishlist means that it's an info-level tag. Lintian doesn't
display info-level tags by default, intentionally, to encourage more
people to use it who don't want to see things that aren't required.
I think wishlist is the correct severity for this.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: