Re: doc-base is hugely unloved; bug mass-filing needed?
Steve> non-desktop systems, I don't think we install a doc-base browser
Steve> by default, and I have never seen a text-mode browser for
Steve> doc-base documentation that I found worth using because browsing
Steve> to /usr/share/doc/$package is always quicker. Unless you find a
Steve> way to make doc-base compelling enough that developers will
Steve> actually dogfood it when they want documentation, I think package
Steve> coverage here is always going to be rather poor.
X11 != GNOME, hence !GNOME != text.
dwww and dhelp. I use dwww all the time. Browsing /doc directly only
works when you already know the target package, which I don't, most of
If there is already a lintian check for this (as Vincent Bernat writes a
bit down the thread), does that mean the warning gets ignored or
overridden in all these cases?
PS.: I am not subscribed to the list, so please Cc me on replies. Is
Mail-Copies-To another good idea that has fallen by the wayside? :-(
Ian Zimmerman <email@example.com>
gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD
fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD
Ham is for reading, not for eating.