Re: another disadvantage of backports

To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: another disadvantage of backports
From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:19:53 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100630191953.GC23381@lisa.snow-crash.org>
Mail-followup-to: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201006302043.11157.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] 20100629163519.GB5433@gnu.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20100629170727.3d70722d.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20100629203125.af7af9af.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> <[🔎] 201006302043.11157.holger@layer-acht.org>

Holger Levsen schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:

> backports.org is (currently) not available for all debian archs.
same as experimental.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
- another disadvantage of backports
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: another disadvantage of backports
Next by Date: Re: Bindv6only once again
Previous by thread: another disadvantage of backports
Next by thread: Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread