another disadvantage of backports

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: another disadvantage of backports
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:43:10 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201006302043.11157.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100629203125.af7af9af.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20100629163519.GB5433@gnu.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20100629170727.3d70722d.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20100629203125.af7af9af.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>

backports.org is (currently) not available for all debian archs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another disadvantage of backports
  - From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>

References:
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
- Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Purpose and policy of the future backports.debian.org.
Next by Date: Re: another disadvantage of backports
Previous by thread: Re: xulrunner 1.9.2 into sid?
Next by thread: Re: another disadvantage of backports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread