On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 21:14 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote: > clamz [1] has been rejected from Debian NEW [2] some time ago. > The FTP assistent that processed the package was of the > opinion that it belongs to contrib instead of main because it's > only useful to download non-free content. > > The purpose of clamz is to download MP3 files after buying them > from Amazon. You can download MP3s with every browser though > and Debian even has many MP3 decoders in main. > I don't see why this is a problem. > > There is another package in main that is similar in this > respect: youtube-dl. Some material on YouTube may be under a free licence, e.g. <http://www.youtube.com/fosdemtalks> (though this isn't explicitly stated there). > So what is the reason that clamz can't be in main? There aren't any clearly DFSG-free tracks on the Amazon MP3 store. This may be under CC BY-SA but it's not explicitly stated which licence is used: <http://www.amazon.com/Creative-Commons-Muse-Me/dp/B002FAQTSA/> <http://www.thestrongestwhisper.com/cc.html> "These songs are creative commons protected; they are royalty-free songs. So I encourage musicians to play, record, and sell your performances of these songs, and send me mp3 files of them." Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part