On Apr 27, Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > - as explained in #560238, it is still not the time to make a choice > Not sure what you mean here. We have time until the freeze to determine the impact of this change. > Anyway, is there a reason that #560238 isn't blocked by #560044 given it > breaks that package or are you not bothered about breaking non-free > software? Nobody bothered to register this in the BTS, I did now. I am not a java user, so I am unable to evaluate the practical impact of this implementation being still broken. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature