[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]



Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:40 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
> Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 18:49 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > I'm sure you meant "browser-plugin-*" here ...
> > > Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option. Then we would have
> > > 
> > >      1. browser-plugin-*
> > >      2. browserplugin-*
> > >      3. *-browserplugin
> > >      4. *-browser-plugin
> > > 
> > > I think all of these would work (with a slight preference to 1. or 2.).
> > > Opinions?
> > 
> > Please don't do polls on a mailing list :-)
> > 
> > Arguments have been given for using '-' in the name (while I haven't
> > seen any argument for _not_ using dashes). I presume the general feeling
> > about whether it should be at the beginning or at the end of packages is
> > "we don't particularly care", as long as it is consistent.
> > 
> > I personally don't think a poll is needed, but if you feel it is please
> > set up one somewhere and post just a participation link.
> 
> I setup a doodle poll: http://www.doodle.com/2wmykvgy7ara5pd5
> 
> Please participate there. And yes, doodle is designed for schedules, but
> not for polls. ;)

I create a new poll that allows yes/no/maybe:
http://www.doodle.com/guafbbhipwskzr8a

Please add yourself there. Sorry for the inconvenience.

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Reply to: