[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]



On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > I'm sure you meant "browser-plugin-*" here ...
> Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option. Then we would have
> 
>      1. browser-plugin-*
>      2. browserplugin-*
>      3. *-browserplugin
>      4. *-browser-plugin
> 
> I think all of these would work (with a slight preference to 1. or 2.).
> Opinions?

Please don't do polls on a mailing list :-)

Arguments have been given for using '-' in the name (while I haven't
seen any argument for _not_ using dashes). I presume the general feeling
about whether it should be at the beginning or at the end of packages is
"we don't particularly care", as long as it is consistent.

I personally don't think a poll is needed, but if you feel it is please
set up one somewhere and post just a participation link.

Thanks for attempting to standardize this!
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: