On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Markley wrote: > A package I maintain (opendkim) has released a new major version which > removes support for a commonly-used conf file setting in the previous > version. Although that setting is common, it is not set by default in > the Debian package. > > However, this package has yet to see a Debian release. As such, it is > only in testing and unstable. I'm therefore undecided on whether to > mention this in NEWS. > > How do other developers feel about this? Does it make sense to mention > the configuration change in the NEWS file, considering that this won't > affect any stable release? I would mention something about this change in the NEWS file, as it may be nice to have a record if anyone ever needs to look back for this change and what it effects. That is just my opinions though, I would look for some other DD opinions as well, can't trust just this lowly ; ) -- Luke Cycon <lcycon@gmail.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part