Re: Changes in dpkg Pre-Depends
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
> Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Thomas Weber wrote:
>>> You have x86 hardware that is so old that it doesn't run amd64, but at
>>> the same moment you care about speed?
>> It's not particularly hard to find new hardware with 32 bit Atom chips
>> in it. There's this whole "netbook" thing..
> Atom 330 is 64bit. Just buy the right one.
Yes, but that's (normally) found on mini-ITX boards; at present, I'd be
surprised if the N270, which is 32-bit, isn't the most widely-used in
Were I looking for a new netbook *now*, I'd probably be looking for one with
an Atom N450, which is 64-bit. (Also, N450+NM10 uses less power than
| Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
| using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + It's 1984.
Tact is the unsaid part of what you're thinking.