Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:48:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> > Am 03.02.2010 07:14, schrieb Mike Hommey:
> > > I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix.
> > Fine, but what now? Can we already call this a consensus? Shall I file
> > wishlist bugs against the affected packages? What's the opinion of the
> > affected packages' maintainers?
> We should gather more opinions, especially from the affected packages'
Which, uhm, was his second sentence about exactly. ;)
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' email@example.com | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70