[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]



On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:48:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> > Am 03.02.2010 07:14, schrieb Mike Hommey:
> > > I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix.
> > 
> > Fine, but what now? Can we already call this a consensus? Shall I file 
> > wishlist bugs against the affected packages? What's the opinion of the 
> > affected packages' maintainers?
> 
> We should gather more opinions, especially from the affected packages'
> maintainers.

Which, uhm, was his second sentence about exactly. ;)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70


Reply to: