Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:13:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B6A8FC4.20604@greffrath.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100203061437.GF16291@glandium.org>
References: <[🔎] 1265052871.19111.39.camel@deep-thought> <[🔎] 1265137144.2241.9.camel@beppo> <[🔎] 20100203061437.GF16291@glandium.org>

Am 03.02.2010 07:14, schrieb Mike Hommey:

I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix.

Fine, but what now? Can we already call this a consensus? Shall I filewishlist bugs against the affected packages? What's the opinion of theaffected packages' maintainers?


 - Fabian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>

References:
- Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team
  - From: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>
- Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>
- Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

Prev by Date: Re: git and quilt
Next by Date: Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
Previous by thread: Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
Next by thread: Re: Binary package names for mozilla plugins [Was: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread