[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#568161: ITP: tacacs+ -- TACACS+ authentication daemon

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:06:28AM +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:

> > | * License         : No license, only a copyright file
> > 
> > Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
> > 
> Yeah but what Craig Small said on mentors is that looks very much like a MIT
> license - see COPYING file.
> His mail is here :
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/02/msg00027.html

But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says "without fee" in the
license. I don't know if that means "you can use it without paying anyone" or
"you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone".

> So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
> clear.
> Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?

It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
standard license.

Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
      Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: