Re: Bug#568161: ITP: tacacs+ -- TACACS+ authentication daemon
"Guus Sliepen" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Ecrivait:
>> So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
>> Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?
> It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
> standard license.
I'll update the package tonight (GMT+1 hour) as I'm currently at work - I
don't have all the needed things (and also fix lintian warning btw).
Should I do something particular about that license matter ? except
providing the COPYING file within the packages ?
> Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
> Guus Sliepen <email@example.com>