[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:14:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> That has always been a feature but recently the DAK has changed to throw
> >> away the maintainer build debs (while still requireing them to be
> >> uploaded) and running an autobuild on all archs.
> >
> > No it hasn't changed, yet.
> >
> > Mike
> Still not? damn. It was presented in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/11/msg00001.html
> | The current "winning" opinion is to go with the source+throw away
> | binaries route.  We are close to being able to achieve this, it is
> | simply that it has not yet been enabled.  Before any version of this
> | can be enabled, buildd autosigning needs to be implemented in order
> | that dak can differentiate buildd uploads vs maintainer uploads.
> and later argued that it would suffice to throw away debs in source
> uploads and allow all binary only uploads (from buildds or porters
> doesn't really matter). Looks like ftp-master didn't take to that.

Or they're waiting for other items to be implemented before moving
forward, just like the text you quoted says.

GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: