[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Xen support on Squeeze



On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> writes:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:51AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >> > If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then that's
> > >> > in progress, see:
> > >> > 
> > >> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-12/msg01127.html
> > >> > 
> > >> > the 2.6.32 tree should be available shortly after Jeremy gets back from
> > >> > his vacation.
> > >> 
> > >> What chance does this have of making it in time for Squeeze?
> > >>
> > >
> > > When actually is 'in time' for Squeeze?
> > >
> > > Novell already has the oldstyle xenlinux patches for 2.6.32, so they
> > > could be used, if pv_ops dom0 patches weren't in shape for Squeeze.
> > >
> > > -- Pasi
> > 
> > Given that the pv_ops dom0 is still unstable:
> > 
> > Where are the oldstyle patches for 2.6.32?
> > 
> 
> Various Xen dom0 kernel options listed here:
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels
> 
> Links to the OpenSUSE kernels (including Xen patches):
> 	http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory/
> 	ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/master/
> 	http://www.gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source
> 
> I'll ask Andrew Lyon if he has plans to release more easy-to-use patches 
> against vanilla kernel.org 2.6.32.
> 

This is the reply I got from Andrew Lyon:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-01/msg00592.html

-- Pasi


Reply to: