On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:55:35AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > >as recently pointed out on debian-devel [1], the netatalk package > >is accidently linked against libssl on some arches due to dirty > >buildd chroots. To avoid this license violation, explicit > >Build-Conflicts against libssl-dev should be added and only be > >removed if $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "openssl". > ...or netatalk build routines tightened to not link against openssl > even if available, I assume. The latter is definitely preferred since DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS can't change the value of Build-Conflicts... Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature