[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Xen support on Squeeze

On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net> wrote:
> > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more secure
> > then KVM (or Xen) with QEMU.
> I haven't heard this claim before, do you have any references to support this?

http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/05/xen-security-or-lack-thereof.html links to

I don't know for certain this applies to KVM, however I would assume so.

In doing a search for the above I come across a number of security issues in
Xen that are blamed on QEMU.

Also see:

Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>

Reply to: