Re: where is /etc/hosts supposed to come from?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: where is /etc/hosts supposed to come from?
- From: Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:09:04 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Philipp Kern's message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:11:33 +0000 (UTC)")
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20091227222253.GA19353@dario.dodds.net> <email@example.com> <20091229000312.GD24377@xvii.vinc17.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20091229114613.GB31978@angband.pl> <email@example.com> <20091230173620.GF18722@khazad-dum.debian.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Philipp Kern:
>> That's false. You can use protocol-level gateways, which do NAT and PT
>> (protocol translation).
> Can you point me to one please?
There's DNS64 and BEHAVE, probably with some free implementation. Of
course, there are hardly any users because the entire IPv6 user base
is rather small, and we're talking about a renegade faction of that.
IOS has NAT-PT support, IIRC. It's also patent-encumbered.