[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Build logs from local builds



On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:54:38AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
> >> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> napsal(a):
> >>
> >>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
> >>> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
> >>> discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually not upload them.
> >>>
> >>> I'm in favor of let the buildds generate binaries for all the arch
> >>> (even the one the maintainer used to build the package locally), but
> >>> having to wait a long time to upload a set of .debs and then see them
> >>> discarded it quite uncomfortable, and a waste of time, disk space and
> >>> bandwidth.
> >> On the other side it prevents uploading unbuildable packages.
> > 
> > Absolutely. But, if we're going to this direction, then let
> > dput/dupload simply "ignore" .deb in the .changes, and the archive
> > queue processes still accepts these "partial" uploads (still checking
> > the .deb are in the .changes, of course), we'd have the best of both
> > worlds. Or am I missing something?
> 
> Yes, you're missing at least the lintian checks that happen on ftp-master.

You mean, the ones that should be running on buildd generated packages
anyway ?

Mike


Reply to: